Wotka World Wide

Thursday, October 02, 2008

Why won't the Obama campaign disclose the names and places of origin for over half their donations thus far, estimated at over $200 million? Good question. More:

And then there are the overseas donations — at least, the ones that we know about.

The FEC has compiled a separate database of potentially questionable overseas donations that contains more than 11,500 contributions totaling $33.8 million. More than 520 listed their “state” as “IR,” often an abbreviation for Iran. Another 63 listed it as “UK,” the United Kingdom.

More than 1,400 of the overseas entries clearly were U.S. diplomats or military personnel, who gave an APO address overseas. Their total contributions came to just $201,680.

And then there is this nugget:

In June, Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi gave a public speech praising Obama, claiming foreign nationals were donating to his campaign.

“All the people in the Arab and Islamic world and in Africa applauded this man,” the Libyan leader said. “They welcomed him and prayed for him and for his success, and they may have even been involved in legitimate contribution campaigns to enable him to win the American presidency..."

Though Gadhafi asserted that fundraising from Arab and African nations were “legitimate,” the fact is that U.S. federal law bans any foreigner from donating to a U.S. election campaign.

The rise of the Internet and use of credit cards have made it easier for foreign nationals to donate to American campaigns, especially if they claim their donation is less than $200.

Kinda makes you wonder what is going on? Where is the scrutiny? Oh yeah, the media is in the bag for Obama and can't be bothered with these stories. This means you won't find much about this in the New York Times. Read the whole thing. Via Instapundit.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home