Well, now that the election is over, the New York Times can officially go back to allowing the other side's opinions into print. First off, they allowed Mitt Romney to present his very sensible argument as to why the Detroit automakers should be allowed to fail. Then you have an editorial arguing that Congress should pass the Colombian Free Trade Agreement ASAP. Funny how this paper works. But of course, prior to the election, they wouldn't even allow John McCain an opportunity to rebut claims made by Barack Obama in a misleading op-ed piece about Iraq. Anyone still wondering why they are hemorrhaging subscribers and cutting staff?